|
After five years, for a personal curiosity I researched whether the alignment of the previous pano could be improved... But the Udeuschle rendering is as different from the reality as it was at the time!
Now that we are accustomed to obtain from the rendering an almost perfect shaping of the mountain, we have to realize that for certain forgotten parts of the world this is not yet true! (I had similar problems with N.9762)
29 images, Sony DSC-RX10M3, ISO 100, 1/1600 sec, f/4, 77 mm
GPS track: https://www.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/view.do?id=179383817
Peter Brandt, Jörg Braukmann, Klaus Brückner, Hans-Jörg Bäuerle, Günter Diez, J. Engelhardt, Martin Kraus, Dieter Leimkötter, Wilfried Malz, Giuseppe Marzulli, Matthias Matthey, Danko Rihter, Björn Sothmann, Arjan Veldhuis, Jens Vischer, Benjamin Vogel, Alexander Von Mackensen, Augustin Werner
|
 |
Comments
Cheers, Hans-Jörg
I had in mind the nose at 130°, but when I tackled the slippery slopes I soon realized that those 4953 m were not worth the detour.
I was rewarded at evening (better to say: at night, since at these latitudes only day and night exist, no place for Morgengrauen, Abenddämmerung or similar inventions), when I had the time to climb the 5205 at 220° (see N.29473 and N.29455).
With further research I perhaps found a name for the 4991 summit with a pole on top, at 23°. It should be a Pucaraju, "red mountain". Of course, such a minimal Pucaraju is nothing when compared to a medium-size Pucaraju such as the one in N.26284, or with the very best Pucaraju, namely, the one in N.26685.
And, with all the respect for the Pucaraju / Nevado Santa Cruz, I still prefer the divine veiled vision that I had for a moment of the Pucajirca, or "red col", little more than 6000 m: https://bit.ly/2BIM6yY
I have no pano of this, since the magic lasted only a moment, and luckily fitted into a single shot...
Cheers,
Alberto.
Leave a comment