Nizza   71111
previous panorama
next panorama
Details / LabelsDetails / Labels Markers on / offMarkers on / off Overview on / offOverview on / off   
 Cycle through labels:   first previous stop
next last
  zoom out


1 Antibes
2 Pic du Cap Roux, 453m
3 Pic de l'Ours, 488m
4 Grosses Grues, 440m
5 Aéroport de Nice
6 Les Suvières, 559m
7 Mont Vinaigre, 614m
8 Villeneuve-Loubet
9 Château de Nice
10 Port Lympia
11 Promenade des Anglais
12 Saint-François-de-Paule
13 Negresco
14 Cathédrale Sainte Reparate
15 La Croix de Cabris, 788m
16 Casa natale di Garibaldi
17 Place Massena
18 Notre Dame du Port
19 Théâtre National de Nice
20 Place Garibaldi
21 MAMAC (Musée d'Art moderne et d'Art contemporain)
22 Pic de Courmettes, 1248m
23 Gare de Nice-Ville
24 Colle des Pouis, 1174m
25 Baou de Saint-Jeannet, 802m
26 Cime du Cheiron, 1778m
27 Baou de la Gaude, 796m
28 Piscine Jean Bouin
29 Mouton d'Anou, 1079m
30 Palais des Expositions


Location: Fort du Mont Alban (222 m)      by: Giuseppe Marzulli
Area: France      Date: 3 January 2018
A view of Nizza (Nice) from the Fort du Mont Alban (Forte del Monte Albano). Fort of Mont Alban is a piedmontese military fortification built between 1557 and 1560, located on the hill of the same name, between Nice and the bay of Villefranche. In France, it is one of the rare examples of military architecture of the middle of the sixteenth century, in good condition.


Realy Nice 
sorry, das Wortspiel konnte ich mir wirklich nicht verkneifen.

Sehr schöne, gut gemachte Stadtansicht. Wäre sicher ein guter Standort für Aufnahmen zur blauen Stunde bzw. für ein Nachtbild.
Leider sind die Beschriftungen im Stadtbereich nur schlecht lesbar, die Farbwahl rot wäre hier besser.
2018/01/15 12:11 , Dieter Leimkötter
I put the city labels in red.
2018/01/15 20:41 , Giuseppe Marzulli
the sharpness for me seems to be suboptimal, a bit roughly. Perhaps you can try to sharp it another way.
LG Jörg
2018/01/17 18:50 , Jörg Nitz
You're probably right. But it should be considered that I always look for new views.
I do not do as others that always present more or less the same views ;-)
2018/01/17 19:30 , Giuseppe Marzulli
Giuspeppe, I think this is a misunderstanding. For me the sharpness is not optimal in general at this pano.
LG Jörg
2018/01/17 19:47 , Jörg Nitz
I do not think there is any misunderstanding. I have always supported and I support even now that the evaluation must take into account above all the originality and the pleasantness of the panorama.
There are too many repetitive panoramas, all the same, which, even if technically perfect, are completely insignificant and do not deserve any positive evaluation.
2018/01/17 21:23 , Giuseppe Marzulli
More generally, the evaluation system is wrong and the evaluations rarely correspond to the real value of the panorama. That said, I like to take panoramas and will continue to insert panoramas. But without giving any value to the evaluation system.
I would also add that, in terms of sharpness, you're right.
2018/01/17 21:30 , Giuseppe Marzulli

Leave a comment

Giuseppe Marzulli

More panoramas

... in the vicinity  
... in the top 100