| Punta Marguareis, 2651m |
| Cima Missun, 2356m |
| Cima delle Saline, 2612m |
| Monte Saccarello, 2201m |
| Pizzo d'Ormea, 2476m |
| Monte Gerbonte, 1727m |
| G.M. |
| Cima Garlenda, 2141m |
| Monte Fronte', 2152m |
| Colle del Garezzo, 1795m |
| Monte Galero, 1708m |
| Monte Monega, 1882m |
| Valle Argentina |
| Carmo dei Brocchi, 1650m |
| Andagna |
| Triora |
| Monte Moro, 1184m |
| Valle Argentina |
| Monte Faudo, 1149m |
| Lago di Tenarda |
| Monte Ceppo, 1627m |
| (Arma di Taggia) |
| Rifugio Allavena |
| Monte Cinto (Corsica), 2706m; 207,3km |
| (Sanremo) |
| Monte Bignone, 1299m |
| Monte Caggio, 1090m |
| MAR LIGURE |
| Monte Santa Croce |
| (Ventimiglia) |
Argentina valley.
Argentina is a small Italian river in Liguria. Its source is near the French border (monte Saccarello). The river flows past Triora and flows south before emptying into the Ligurian Sea. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentina_(Fluss) |
 |
|||||||||||||||
 |
 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Comments
Cheers, Hans-Jörg
Rather the etymology of the name comes from some silver mines. Silver in Italian is said "argento".
So we could say.... "Silver Valley".
But I think you already knew that ;-)
LG Jörg
I think that the attribution to ap or pp not depends on your location, but from the purpose of the pano.
Take for example the panos 11129 or 11189. Jörg Engelhardt posted those panos in pp and I think he did very well, because the purpose of these panos is to show certain atmospheric phenomena and not to show the mountains.
Similarly, this pano, which is oriented towards the southeast, shows Valle Argentina, Corsica (and I'm a little surprised that no one detected it) in the distance and the Ligurian coast (hidden by the haze).
I should also note that even you yourself have used the same logic in the pano 15652, from Le Haut Montet.
You posted in pp the pano faces south and you posted in the ap the pano 360°, always from the same point.
Which definitely shows that everything is debatable ;-)
Of course different opinions are welcome. I agree that it is not dependent of the location, where the panorama should be shown. At all panoramas you mention, almost no mountains of the Alps are viewable. But at this one almost only peaks of the alps are in the foreground. So I can't find any reason to show it here. May be you presented it here because of the automn colours. But that means almost any panorama of the Alps e.g. with nice colours, clowds, snow, flowers could be posted at this site
For me the volume of the peaks inside the picture makes the difference.
But of course you have the freedom to decide where you will show it :-)
LG Jörg
Leave a comment